No further comment neccessary...
Friday, November 03, 2006
Desperate Republican Vote Theft?
CHECK YOUR VOTES VERY CAREFULLY!
Thursday, November 02, 2006
Buying Votes The Lieberman Way
For those of you unfamiliar with the term...
It means money used to BUY votes.
And Schlesinger says "It makes no other sense."
So Joe... What are you really trying to hide by not disclosing who all of that $387,000 in "Petty Cash" went to? This scandal ain't going away just becsause you chose to hide your campaign finance ledgers from the public.
Feeling Lucky?
Lieberman = The Definition Of Insanity
Ned Lamont drives the point home in a new add:
Vote for Ned Lamont!
Connecticut For Lieberman? Yeah right...
Tuesday, October 31, 2006
Why Nutmeggers Are Against Lieberman, Johnson, Shays & Simmons
Last night on the NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, columnist Mark Shields dropped this little bombshell:
MARK SHIELDS: The highest ranking or certainly one of the highest ranking men in the United States military today has recommended that we remove all troops from Baghdad
...snip...
JIM LEHRER: So who did he make this recommendation to?
MARK SHIELDS: He made it to the civilian leadership of the United States.
Of course there is no doubt that the Bush administration will follow the soldiers suggestion since Bush claims that he always takes their advice... So that there is no question concerning the Bush's intentions for winning the hearts and minds of Iraqis the Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Karen Hughes headed off to the Middle East, to deliver "news" of the newest Bush plan:
- Substantially expand…[the] “Micro scholarship” program…targeted at youth in key disadvantaged areas in Iraq, such as Sadr City or Anbar Governorate.”
- Create a fund to support media projects by Iraqis, such as documentaries, short films, animation, audio-visual productions and other material that would show Iraq’s reality to pan-Arab and pan-Islamic audiences.
- Revive book publishing in Iraq to fill the intellectual vacuum…and support…Iraq’s hard-pressed intellectuals.
Hey wait a second? That sounds suspiciously more like "RE-EDUCATION" AND PROPAGANDA PROGRAMS, like the previous propaganda programs run by the Lincoln Group in Iraq, than it does like pulling out of Baghdad.
- “Donald Rumsfeld is backing off his claim last week that the Pentagon had stopped paying to plant stories in the Iraqi news media,” the AP reports.
- On Sunday’s ABC This Week, Stephen Hadley acknowledged that President Bush has not yet ordered the shut-down of the Pentagon’s propaganda campaign in Iraq.
- The UK Independent presents examples of the Lincoln Group’s propaganda work in Iraq, which one military specialist described as “comical.” One exaggerated headline: ‘IRAQI ARMY DEFEATS TERRORISM.’
We all know how successful those PROPAGANDA PROGRAMS were. Just look at where we are now, eh?
In a freaking vicious cycle of "Stay the course!", even while this BOZO administration and their supporters like Lieberman, Johnson, Shays, and Simmons, are denying that fact. And all because of the Bush administrations refusal to do what everyone in America knows they should do.
Listen to the military that is telling you that we need to get out of this mess. Listen to the American people, that obviously know better than you OR any of your supposed "Foreign Policy Experts". Propaganda will not win anything in Iraq.
"Change the Course!"
Those of you that support the failed Bush administration's policies - Lieberman, Simmons, Shays and Johnson - are going to get a rude awakening on November 7th.
Because "We, the outraged people", are changing the course whether you like it or not! For all of you propaganda spouting turds on the failed GOP side, I have only one question for you:
"Are you with us or against us?"
Lamont Has Grassroots Support
The Democratic establishment in Washington isn't doing much for Ned Lamont:
Ned Lamont got little financial support from congressional Democrats - and none from Connecticut Sen. Christopher J. Dodd and key Senate veterans - in the crucial weeks after he won the party's Senate nomination Aug. 8, according to new campaign finance data.
Lamont has alot of money, money that he has ponied up on his own, and money from the grassroots. Lamont doesn't get much from the entrenched establishment because they are afraid of him. But having the largest base of grassroot support in Connecticut is a good thing if you are looking to fix what is broken on Capitol Hill. Lamont hasn't taken anything from corporate lobbyists, and nothing from any PACs.
Ned Lamont's support is people powered.
Joe Lieberman has alot of money. He had a HUGE war che$t. But where does all of that money come from? Lobbyists and PACs and from republican supporters that want to see the Connecticut-bush-clone "Stay the course!"
Joe Lieberman's support is the problem that needs to be fixed.
Face the facts... Influence for votes on Capitol Hill is a bought and sold commodity to the entrenched establishment. Lobbyists for special interests, PACs, and corporations are buying the old guard establishment on a daily basis, and we are the ones that are losing out.
Voting for Ned Lamont is one little step that can help stem the tide of corruption. It can help take back one of those votes in the Senate and make it ours. It can help make that one vote beholden to us Nutmeggers and NOT to the entrenched establishment that is afraid of what the Lamont campaign means to them.
Can we afford to miss this opportunity to take back that one Seanate vote for ourselves? Not if we truely want to fix what is wrong with our government.
Change the course!
Vote for Ned Lamont
Monday, October 30, 2006
Lamont Rocks!
There is no doubt that
JOE HAS GOT TO GO!
Democratic candidate Ned Lamont will
"CHANGE THE COURSE!"
Lieberman info
Sunday, October 29, 2006
Hastert Lies AGAIN...
Democrat Leader Pelosi’s plan is to leave our borders open, grant blanket amnesty and provide Social Security benefits to illegal immigrants. Is THAT their plan? Democrat Leader Nancy Pelosi has NEVER visited the border. She claims to understand the needs of those on the front lines but has never visited those agents and offers no solutions.
How do we know it was another Hastert lie?
Here is a snippet from the Pelosi response:
“I visited the southern border in March with Congressman Silvestre Reyes, who had a distinguished career of leadership in the Border Patrol. I was able to see firsthand the Republicans’ record of failure on border security.
“This morning, the President plans to sign legislation authorizing a 700-mile border fence that his own Administration does not plan to build and for which the Republican Congress has not provided construction money.
“This fence that will not actually be built is a perfect symbol of the Republicans’ unwillingness to make controlling our borders a priority."
The Texas Congressman Reyes, after confirming Pelosi's visit to the border, had this to say about it all:
Perhaps that is why after six years of controlling the White House, the Senate, and the House, their ‘signature achievement’ on border security is a 700 mile fence along a 2,000 mile border. This fence doesn’t come close to solving our problem.
Unfortunately, no amount of photo-ops or signing ceremonies is going to take the place of real leadership on this vitally important issue.
I am certain the planned 12 foot high fence will increase the sales in Mexico of 13 foot ladders to get over it and shovels to dig under it, but I doubt it will stop many illegal border crossings. I also think that Hastert doesn't understand the real needs concerning securing our borders and hasn't offered any real solution at all.
Now that Hasterts latest lie has been exposed, I wonder how long it will be before he addresses his earlier lies about the Foley cover-up? Brian Ross at ABC news' The Blotter has an update on another Republican being investigated:
A source close to former House Clerk Jeff Trandahl told ABC News that Arizona Congressman Jim Kolbe (R-Ariz.) was one of a small number of "problem members"
...snip...
Kolbe was also asked by reporters to respond to reports that the U.S. Attorney in Phoenix has opened a preliminary inquiry into a 1996 camping trip Kolbe took with two high school boys, both former pages, following a report by MSNBC that one adult member of the trip was "creeped out" by "fawning, petting and touching" on the arms, shoulders and back of one of the teenagers by Kolbe.
"I know there are a number of inquiries underway, and we're cooperating fully with all those inquiries, and I'm sure at the end of the time it will show that we acted appropriately and did exactly the right thing," Kolbe said.
"A small number of "problem members""?
"A number of inquiries"?
"All those inquiries"?
IS ANYONE ELSE SEEING A LOT BIGGER PROBLEM HERE?
Just how many Republicans are being investigated? I am starting to think that I will have to keep my kids locked inside my home, at least until the elections are over, just in case a Republican comes to the neighborhood campaigning... Because you never know if they are one of the ones being investigated... Because Hastert and the rest of the GOP leadership covers up for all of them.
Is Nancy Johnson Wrong AGAIN? CT- 05
Tuesday was a bad day for Republican Congresswoman Nancy Johnson.
First, the AFL-CIO issued a “report card” on the congresswoman’s record on working family issues during her 24 years as the Republican representative in the state’s Fifth Congressional District – a report card with a failing grade.
Next, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee distributed a list of Johnson’s record on health care, including the $739,000 she’s taken from pharmaceutical companies.
Then, signs began sprouting on trees on Rt. 7 and elsewhere in the Northwest Corner that say “Nancy Johnson is WRONG.” But the word “is” is written in such small letters that drivers passing by see only the words “Nancy Johnson WRONG.”
--- Read the rest at The Corner Report
Apparently there are alot of people that think NANCY JOHNSON is WRONG. Welcome to the club that seems to grow exponentially as the campaign season progresses towards
"NATIONAL KICK THE CORRUPT REPUBLICAN BUMS OUT DAY"
The Corner Report is a pretty good read. It has the look and feel of a typical Blog, but the writing style of a hometown paper. I couldn't help but stop and check out a few of the articles while I was there. Definately worth repeat visits.
The article also reminded me of a little sign problem we have in our town:
There is an empty house for sale a couple of streets over from where I live. I noticed a "Vote Johnson" sign up there a few times but it kept disappearing. There one day, gone the next. A couple of weeks ago I saw the people that used to live there and as I watched they removed the sign and tossed it in the garbage. The sign still keeps popping up on that empty for sale house.
And it keeps *POOF* vanishing.
It is obvious that someone keeps putting the sign there against the owners will in the hopes of "creating" a view of alot more local support for Johnson than there really is.
It's like Joe Lieberman's $387,000 illegal slush fund that was apparently used to pay for out of state people, from NJ and elsewheres, to campaign for him here because he doesn't have that sort of volunteer base in Connecticut like Ned Lamont does. Joe's support is strictly lobbyists' and other Republican money sources funneled through back-channels that pays for campign muscle. Some call them the "Liebergoons". lol
I guess Lieberman and Johnson are both pretty darn pathetic! That is what happens to career politicians when they sell their souls to corporate lobbyists and continue to cling to the failed policies of the Bush administration...
They lose touch with the people, and they lose all of their local support.
Certainly there are still some hardcore right-wing-nuts that will support any republican candidate regardless of their corruption and incompetence. But, thankfully, their numbers are obviously dwindling.
Thursday, October 26, 2006
How Does The Incompetent Bush Admin. Confirm Intel Reports on WMDs?
They wait for things to BLOW UP!
Buried in the bowels of a Washington Post story by Glenn Kessler, while travelling with Condi Rice on a "Junk It" in Moscow, reveals the incompetent Bush administration's strategy for assesing North Korea's advances in developing their nuclear technology:
Before North Korea announced it had detonated a nuclear device, some senior officials even said they were quietly rooting for a test, believing that would finally clarify the debate within the administration.
Yep... Just sit back and wait for the explosions.
Isn't that the same tactic they used to assess the threat when reports that "Al Quaeda determined to attack within US" hit the administrations' desks before 9-11? The same tactic that resulted in a "Goat" eyed president frozen from fear and staring at the bright lights of jets crashing into buildings.
The GOP and their pet neocons still sit and wait for the explosions...
While the rest of America has to watch the American death toll get higher and higher in the biggest military blunder ever in American history. You know? The "Civil War in Iraq". The one that everyone lays much of the blame at the feet of Donald Rumsfeld for his gross incompetence, bordering on negligence when it comes to equiping our soldiers with the needed equipment to do the job. A situation that to this day has yet to be rectified.
And just in case you weren't already worried enough about the Bush administrations' innumerable past failures, whom do they put on the job to protect us from the next attacks?
After 9/11, the United States launched an extensive effort to stop the spread of weapons of mass destruction. The Special Operations Command, which has been directed by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to take the lead in planning and leading U.S. counter-terror campaigns, is playing a major role.
SOCOM’s commander, Army Gen. Bryan D. Brown, told the conference that he has given Rumsfeld a 600-page plan to fight a global war, including a strategy to prevent terrorists from using mass-casualty weapons against the U.S. The plan went through six revisions before Rumsfeld accepted it, Brown said.
He revealed few details of the plan. A key concept, however, is in the slogan, “no borders, no boundaries,” he said. “We don’t have geographical boundaries in special operations,” he said. “We have a global defense.”
That slogan also is meant to be taken intellectually, he said. “The borders and boundaries in our minds are those of our own making,” he said. “In fighting this war, we have to think outside the box.”
National Defense Magazine - February 2005
Donald
"The Most Incompetent Neocon Of Them All!"
Rumsfeld...
Apparently, given their actual track record, their idea of "thinking outside the box" is to wait for the "mushroom cloud" here in the USA... Then, and only then, will the Bush administration be able to confirm reports that terrorists wanted to attack us again.
But Bush won't mind if that happens.
In an all-out PR assault, co-ordinated by Rove with the "embeded MSM", Bush will just declare that:
"They are blowing us up over here because we are winning over there!"
And some Americans, the kind that blindly cheered when a similar meek-minded battlecry eminated from the Cheerleader in Chief's office, the kind that blindly follow the incompetent bush and support lying GOP candidates without question as to where the GOPs' real loyalties lay, will hail this as a combination of both foreign & domestic policy genius.
Genius MY ASS!
Those kind of GOP supporters should do themselves a favor. Go and buy themselves a new campaign T-shirt with this self-evident GOP campaign slogan boldly emblazoned upon it:
VOTE GOP"
Just add a few "Faux-Patriotic" stars and stripes and the picture will be complete. And then those GOP supporters can sit and wait with all of the patience of the ranting and raving lunatics that they are (much like their idiot leader Bush) for the next explosion coming to a city near them if they get their way in the November 7th elections.
Bush and Lieberman in Hot Water
"Stay the course!"
That is all you will get from both Bush and Lieberman.
Despite President Bush's recent denials that "We've never been stay the course" and the NY Times' FALSE assertions to counter Ned Lamont's caqmpaign charges that Joe Lieberman has been a consistent cheerleader for Bush's failed "Stay the course!" policy, the fact remains that this is a bold face lie that exposes BOTH Bush and Lieberman's penchant for polticizing this war by telling people whatever they have to in order to cover their political asses and get more votes. It also doesn't say much about the researchers and writers at the "Post Judy Miller" NY Times.
In Bush's and Lieberman's own words:
BUSH: We will stay the course. [8/30/06]
LIEBERMAN: We have to stay the course in Iraq now and continue to build a stable, modernizing, democratizing country there. [01/04/04]
BUSH: We will stay the course, we will complete the job in Iraq. [8/4/05]
LIEBERMAN: We can do better. I will do better. I will make it international. I will stay the course, and I'll create a stable, democratizing, modernizing Iraq, which would be a tremendous step forward in the Middle East and the Islamic world and in our war against terrorism. [01/11/2004]
BUSH: We will stay the course until the job is done, Steve. And the temptation is to try to get the President or somebody to put a timetable on the definition of getting the job done. We’re just going to stay the course. [12/15/03
LIEBERMAN: Well, let's put it this way. What I'm most happy about is that he said that he will stay the course in Iraq until we finish the job, and the Iraqis are in control of their own destiny. [07/28/04]
BUSH: And my message today to those in Iraq is: We’ll stay the course. [4/13/04]
LIEBERMAN: We want to not only stay the course: we want to achieve victory. [04/26/04]
BUSH: And that’s why we’re going to stay the course in Iraq. And that’s why when we say something in Iraq, we’re going to do it. [4/16/04]
LIEBERMAN: "I thought the president gave the strongest case that I can remember him giving about why we went in and why we have to stay the course," Lieberman said, adding, "We've got to adopt a strategy of success. A defeat will create chaos in Iraq, chaos in the Middle East, and will embolden the terrorists in a way that will endanger our future and our children's future." [04/15/04]
Here is over 30 examples of Bush saying we must "Stay the course!" in some form or another. Media Matters has the goods on more of Lieberman's "Bush enabling" statements that mirror Bush administration talking points as perfectly as if they had come straight out of Karl Rove's mouth, even emulating the GOP talking point that defeat will create chaos "and will embolden the terrorists" that we have heard so often from every mouthpiece for the Bush administration.
If defeat will create chaos then we must be losing pretty badly since those terrorists are getting pretty emboldened according to defeatist Republican Senator Lindsey Graham:
"We're on the verge of chaos, and the current plan is not working," Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said in an Associated Press interview. U.S. and Iraqi officials should be held accountable for the lack of progress, said Graham, a Republican who is a frequent critic of the administration's policies.
Asked who in particular should be held accountable Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, perhaps, or the generals leading the war Graham said: "All of them. It's their job to come up with a game plan" to end the violence
Bush and Liberman clearly say stay the course over and over. Because you never know who you might embolden in defeat. Now BOTH Bush and Lieberman are trying to hide from their mutual love of staying the course. It's almost like they are freaking flip-flopping clones.
This is why Ned Lamont is correct in attacking Lieberman's support of the failed Bush policy of staying the course. And Lieberman hates that.
And Senator Graham is right in laying alot of blame on Donald Rumsfeld. Here is what Rumsfeld has to say about Bush cutting and running from his "Stay the course!" policy:
Rumsfeld called media reports about Bush’s reversal “nonsense,” and said “of course” Bush is “not backing away from staying the course.”
---CLICK HERE TO LISTEN
The ever-incompetent Rumsfeld says that "Stay the course!" is still the Bush plan, regardless of the Bush "cut and run" posturing.
Lieberman and Bush are both in some hot water over their attempts to hide from their "Stay the course!" whitewash. If you vote for Joe Lieberman you are clearly voting for more of the same CHAOS. And all of the Bush backpeddling and NY Times' lies can't hide Lieberman from his own public record of support for the failed "Stay the course" Bush policy.
Vote For the Democratic candidate Ned Lamont, because he will work to "CHANGE THE COURSE!" of Lieberman's and the Bush administration's failed policies.
Don't look at this!
So you can be an informed voter:
Info on Ned Lamont:
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - Official Campaign Website
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - Ned Lamont, the Political Entrepreneur
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - "Democrats Back Lamont; Lieberman Files Independent Run" (F0x)
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - Unofficial Ned Lamont Resource
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - Unofficial Lamont Blog
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - "The Democrats Mean Business" (WSJ)
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - "Ned Lamont vs. Joe Lieberman" (The Nation)
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - "Lieberman Loses Debate With Challenger Ned Lamont"
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - "Lamont: Lieberman Sounded Like Cheney"
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - "Lamont Fires Up Naples" (New Haven Independent)
Info on Joe Lieberman:
Joe Lieberman - "Seasonal Memory Lapses" by Paul Bass (Hartford Courant)
Joe Lieberman - "Truth About Joe"
Joe Lieberman - "Lieberman Wins Republican Friends, Democratic Enemies..." (WaPo)
Joe Lieberman - "Joe Lieberman is a Big Oil Republican" (LamontBlog)
Joe Lieberman - "Kerry Calls Lieberman the New Cheney" (ABC)
Joe Lieberman - "Joe Lieberman Doesn't Care About Handicapped People" (Wonkette)
Joe Lieberman - "Joe Lieberman is Running With a Bad Crowd" (Firedoglake)
Joe Lieberman - "116 Reasons Not to Vote for Joe Lieberman"
Joe Lieberman - "How Joe Lieberman Tried to Kill Rock 'N Roll" (Huffington Post)
Info on Alan Schlesinger:
Alan Schlesinger and Joe Lieberman
Alan Schlesinger and Joe Lieberman
Info on races across the nation:
--AZ-Sen: Jon Kyl
--AZ-01: Rick Renzi
--AZ-05: J.D. Hayworth
--CA-04: John Doolittle
--CA-11: Richard Pombo
--CA-50: Brian Bilbray
--CO-04: Marilyn Musgrave
--CO-05: Doug Lamborn
--CO-07: Rick O'Donnell
--CT-04: Christopher Shays
--FL-13: Vernon Buchanan
--FL-16: Joe Negron
--FL-22: Clay Shaw
--ID-01: Bill Sali
--IL-06: Peter Roskam
--IL-10: Mark Kirk
--IL-14: Dennis Hastert
--IN-02: Chris Chocola
--IN-08: John Hostettler
--IA-01: Mike Whalen
--KS-02: Jim Ryun
--KY-03: Anne Northup
--KY-04: Geoff Davis
--MD-Sen: Michael Steele
--MN-01: Gil Gutknecht
--MN-06: Michele Bachmann
--MO-Sen: Jim Talent
--MT-Sen: Conrad Burns
--NV-03: Jon Porter
--NH-02: Charlie Bass
--NJ-07: Mike Ferguson
--NM-01: Heather Wilson
--NY-03: Peter King
--NY-20: John Sweeney
--NY-26: Tom Reynolds
--NY-29: Randy Kuhl
--NC-08: Robin Hayes
--NC-11: Charles Taylor
--OH-01: Steve Chabot
--OH-02: Jean Schmidt
--OH-15: Deborah Pryce
--OH-18: Joy Padgett
--PA-04: Melissa Hart
--PA-07: Curt Weldon
--PA-08: Mike Fitzpatrick
--PA-10: Don Sherwood
--RI-Sen: Lincoln Chafee
--TN-Sen: Bob Corker
--VA-Sen: George Allen
--VA-10: Frank Wolf
--WA-Sen: Mike McGavick
--WA-08: Dave Reichert
CT Blogs-
Drinking Liberally, New Milford-
Hat City Blog- Joe Lieberman's Blog-
Lamont Campaign Blog (official)-
CT Campaigns-
CT Sites-
Judith Blei Government Relations-
Lamont Resource (unofficial)
Ned Lamont Joe Lieberman Nancy Johnson Chris Shays Rob Simmons Connecticut post Dianne Farell Chris Murphy Joe Courtney CT Races Elections CT-04 CT-05 CT-02 CT-Gov Governor Jodi Rell CT Campaigns Ned Lamont (Sen) Chris Murphy (CT-05) Joe Courtney (CT-02) Diane Farrell (CT-04) John DeStefano (Gov) George W Bush Dick Cheney Mark Foley Denis Hastert GOP republican democrat independent polls local hartord courant danbury new milford town news-times spectrum my left nutmeg stamford advocate washington times WaPo NY Times Greenwhich times
Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman Joe Lieberman
Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont Ned Lamont
Tuesday, October 24, 2006
Information on campaigns across Connecticut and the nation
So you can be an informed voter:
Info on Ned Lamont:
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - Official Campaign Website
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - Ned Lamont, the Political Entrepreneur
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - "Democrats Back Lamont; Lieberman Files Independent Run" (F0x)
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - Unofficial Ned Lamont Resource
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - Unofficial Lamont Blog
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - "The Democrats Mean Business" (WSJ)
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - "Ned Lamont vs. Joe Lieberman" (The Nation)
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - "Lieberman Loses Debate With Challenger Ned Lamont"
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - "Lamont: Lieberman Sounded Like Cheney"
Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman - "Lamont Fires Up Naples" (New Haven Independent)
Info on Joe Lieberman:
Joe Lieberman - "Seasonal Memory Lapses" by Paul Bass (Hartford Courant)
Joe Lieberman - "Truth About Joe"
Joe Lieberman - "Lieberman Wins Republican Friends, Democratic Enemies..." (WaPo)
Joe Lieberman - "Joe Lieberman is a Big Oil Republican" (LamontBlog)
Joe Lieberman - "Kerry Calls Lieberman the New Cheney" (ABC)
Joe Lieberman - "Joe Lieberman Doesn't Care About Handicapped People" (Wonkette)
Joe Lieberman - "Joe Lieberman is Running With a Bad Crowd" (Firedoglake)
Joe Lieberman - "116 Reasons Not to Vote for Joe Lieberman"
Joe Lieberman - "How Joe Lieberman Tried to Kill Rock 'N Roll" (Huffington Post)
Info on Alan Schlesinger:
Alan Schlesinger and Joe Lieberman
Alan Schlesinger and Joe Lieberman
Info on races across the nation:
--AZ-Sen: Jon Kyl
--AZ-01: Rick Renzi
--AZ-05: J.D. Hayworth
--CA-04: John Doolittle
--CA-11: Richard Pombo
--CA-50: Brian Bilbray
--CO-04: Marilyn Musgrave
--CO-05: Doug Lamborn
--CO-07: Rick O'Donnell
--CT-04: Christopher Shays
--FL-13: Vernon Buchanan
--FL-16: Joe Negron
--FL-22: Clay Shaw
--ID-01: Bill Sali
--IL-06: Peter Roskam
--IL-10: Mark Kirk
--IL-14: Dennis Hastert
--IN-02: Chris Chocola
--IN-08: John Hostettler
--IA-01: Mike Whalen
--KS-02: Jim Ryun
--KY-03: Anne Northup
--KY-04: Geoff Davis
--MD-Sen: Michael Steele
--MN-01: Gil Gutknecht
--MN-06: Michele Bachmann
--MO-Sen: Jim Talent
--MT-Sen: Conrad Burns
--NV-03: Jon Porter
--NH-02: Charlie Bass
--NJ-07: Mike Ferguson
--NM-01: Heather Wilson
--NY-03: Peter King
--NY-20: John Sweeney
--NY-26: Tom Reynolds
--NY-29: Randy Kuhl
--NC-08: Robin Hayes
--NC-11: Charles Taylor
--OH-01: Steve Chabot
--OH-02: Jean Schmidt
--OH-15: Deborah Pryce
--OH-18: Joy Padgett
--PA-04: Melissa Hart
--PA-07: Curt Weldon
--PA-08: Mike Fitzpatrick
--PA-10: Don Sherwood
--RI-Sen: Lincoln Chafee
--TN-Sen: Bob Corker
--VA-Sen: George Allen
--VA-10: Frank Wolf
--WA-Sen: Mike McGavick
--WA-08: Dave Reichert
CT Blogs-
Drinking Liberally, New Milford-
Hat City Blog- Joe Lieberman's Blog-
Lamont Campaign Blog (official)-
CT Campaigns-
CT Sites-
Judith Blei Government Relations-
Lamont Resource (unofficial)
Ned Lamont Joe Lieberman Nancy Johnson Chris Shays Rob Simmons Connecticut post Dianne Farell Chris Murphy Joe Courtney CT Races Elections CT-04 CT-05 CT-02 CT-Gov Governor Jodi Rell CT Campaigns Ned Lamont (Sen) Chris Murphy (CT-05) Joe Courtney (CT-02) Diane Farrell (CT-04) John DeStefano (Gov) George W Bush Dick Cheney Mark Foley Denis Hastert GOP republican democrat independent polls local hartord courant danbury new milford town news-times spectrum my left nutmeg stamford advocate washington times WaPo NY Times Greenwhich times
Monday, October 23, 2006
The GOP Legacy
If you vote for the GOP or for Lieberman
EXPECT MORE OF THE SAME.
That is exactly what "Stay the course!" means...
Saturday, October 21, 2006
Lieberman and his 3 GOP Torture Loving Buddies in Connecticut
Think BILLBOARD BIG!
Lifted from a dKos diary by DelicateMonster
"A group of religious activists has purchased a giant billboard on the interstate for a massive ad accusing four Connecticut incumbents of voting for torture. The Associated Press reports that the group, Reclaiming the Prophetic Voice, bought the space to target Senator Joe Lieberman and and GOP Reps. Chris Shays, Nancy Johnson and Rob Simmons. According to the AP piece all four voted for the controversial Military Commissions Act of 2006, which allows the President to "authorize aggressive interrogation methods that might otherwise be seen as illegal by international courts." In other words, torture, as well as the suspension of habeas corpus, of course."
They have a picture of the actual billboard up at the I Wage Peace website, a group that is working with Reclaiming the Prophetic Voice to get this message out, if you want to see it.
Sunday, October 15, 2006
Rell: Selling Out CT to Big Apple Buyers
It is bad enough when you see the list of companies that have contracts with the State of Connecticut that are also MAJOR donors to the Rell campaign, something Rell claims she has never done... But today we see that Rell was selling out Connecticut to Big Apple buyers intent on gaining more influence on our States business than she will ever give to regular Nutmeggers.
About 75 people attended the $1,000-per-person reception Thursday evening, said Rell's campaign spokesman, Rich Harris.
Like many of Rell's other fundraising breakfasts, luncheons and receptions, the event was closed to the press. The reception was also not mentioned on Rell's campaign website.
Republican Rell influence peddling? Oh no! Never!
What do you have to hide, Jodi, that you can't let the press into these buyouts of our State?
For a full understanding of influence peddling see Republican criminal/super-lobbyist Jack Abrahmoff, criminal Republican Randy "Duke" Cunningham, criminal Republican Bob Ney, or likely criminal Republican Curt Weldon.
OR, of course, you could just look at Rell's mentor, disgraced Republican and former Governor Rowland to know how that scam works:
Her showing at the Garde Arts Center in New London won't hurt her with voters relieved that this steady-as-she-goes matron is not John G. Rowland, her glib predecessor and former political teammate whose greediness landed him in jail.
But a few gaffes in an otherwise OK performance are what viewers are talking about.
Late in the debate, Mrs. Rell pulled a George W. Bush when considering whether she made any mistakes in office. She didn't name any - though surely she could have wished, for just one thing, that the state Department of Transportation had kept an eye on the contractor who installed hundreds of faulty drains on I-84.
"I'm Jodi Rell, and I am perfect BUT please ignore the skeletons in my closet!"
Good lord!
Rell = GOP + Bush + Rowland + $$$ wasted + incompetent
That is basic math for republican politics...
Wednesday, October 04, 2006
Info on the CT Senate Race:
So you can be an informed voter:
Info on Ned Lamont:
Ned Lamont - Official Campaign Website
Ned Lamont - Ned Lamont, the Political Entrepreneur
Ned Lamont - "Democrats Back Lamont; Lieberman Files Independent Run" (F0x)
Ned Lamont - Unofficial Ned Lamont Resource
Ned Lamont - Unofficial Lamont Blog
Ned Lamont - "The Democrats Mean Business" (WSJ)
Ned Lamont - "Ned Lamont vs. Joe Lieberman" (The Nation)
Ned Lamont - "Lieberman Loses Debate With Challenger Ned Lamont"
Ned Lamont - "Lamont: Lieberman Sounded Like Cheney"
Ned Lamont - "Lamont Fires Up Naples" (New Haven Independent)
Info on Joe Lieberman:
Joe Lieberman - "Seasonal Memory Lapses" by Paul Bass (Hartford Courant)
Joe Lieberman - "Truth About Joe"
Joe Lieberman - "Lieberman Wins Republican Friends, Democratic Enemies..." (WaPo)
Joe Lieberman - "Joe Lieberman is a Big Oil Republican" (LamontBlog)
Joe Lieberman - "Kerry Calls Lieberman the New Cheney" (ABC)
Joe Lieberman - "Joe Lieberman Doesn't Care About Handicapped People" (Wonkette)
Joe Lieberman - "Joe Lieberman is Running With a Bad Crowd" (Firedoglake)
Joe Lieberman - "116 Reasons Not to Vote for Joe Lieberman"
Joe Lieberman - "How Joe Lieberman Tried to Kill Rock 'N Roll" (Huffington Post)
Info on Alan who?
Nevermind... heh